[1762] 5 Brn 493
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by Alexander Tait, Clerk Of Session, One Of The Reporters For The Faculty.
Subject_2 LYON-COURT.
Date: Dundas of Dundas
v.
Dundas of Fingask
22 January 1762 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Laird of Dundas complained to the Lyon, That Dundas of Fingask had got from the Lyon's predecessor, in the year 1744, a grant of an armorial bearing, to which he and his predecessor had right many ages before. The matter was brought before the Lords by an advocation at the instance of Fingask. Dundas disputed the competency; but this plea was soon abandoned, and on the merits the Lords, 22d January 1762 pronounced this interlocutor:—
“Finds, That George Dundas of Dundas, heir-male of James Dundas of that ilk, who was forfeited in the year 1449, but afterwards rehabilitate, has the sole right to use and bear the coat of arms belonging to Dundas of that ilk, as matriculated in the register, authenticated by the subscription of Sir James Balfour then Lord Lyon; and find, That the coat of arms obtained in the 1744, by Thomas Dundas, defender, from the late Lord Lyon, was obtained by obreption, and that he has no right to use the same; and therefore or-dain
the said coat of arms to be recalled and expunged from the Lord Lyon's books, reserving to the said Thomas Dundas to apply for a new coat of arms, as accords : Find the defender Thomas Dundas of Fingask, and Thomas Dundas of Quanal, liable to the pursuer in the expense of the complaint before the Lord Lyon's court, and in the expense of this process of advocation,” &c. And to this interlocutor the Lords adhered.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting