[1752] 2 Elchies 268
Subject_1 HYPOTHEC.
Date: Lessly of Lumquhat
v.
Hunter
30 July 1752
Case No.No. 18.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Arnot, a weaver, being employed by Lessly of Lumquhat to weave two webs of linen, sent them afterwards to Hunter's bleachfield, and marked them with his own name, and then broke, when he owed Hunter an account of bleaching a former parcel of linen; therefore Hunter retained Lumquhat's cloth for payment of that account, saying that he bleached it as Arnot's, whose name was in it, having in his advertisements directed the owners to sew their names in the cloth. Lumquhat sued him before the Justices of Peace, and on a proof of his property, that is, of his property of the yarn, and employing Arnot to weave it, and paying him for weaving, recovered decreet, on payment of the bleaching only of these two webs;—which Hunter suspended;—and Lord Kilkerran affirmed the decreet;—and we adhered, but only by the President's casting vote.—N.B. Lumquhat denied that he knew or consented to Arnot's marking the cloth with his own name. (See Dict. No. 130. p. 2660.)
See Notes.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting