[1752] 1 Elchies 488
Subject_1 TITLE TO PURSUE.
Pollock, &c
v.
Maxwell, &c
1752 ,July 8 .
Case No.No. 2.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Pollock, and others, in whose names ground had been purchased for a meeting-house for the congregation, sued for seat rents, and obtained decreet, and a like decision happening among them, as is mentioned supra, 30th June, Bryson against Wilson. The decreet was suspended, for that the congregation had changed the managers; which coming before Dun, he found, that after the chargers should be reimbursed of the sums laid out by them, they ought to denude to the congregation. But upon a reclaiming bill and answers, we found the original trustees had the right of administration, and in case of a sale, the price to be divided among the contributors, and that the pretended congregation had no action. But here there was no obligement to denude, as in the former case.
See No. 1, voce Reduction.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting