Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A Person having built a dam-dyke, resting upon the ground of another, whose consent he alleged he had obtained, and offered to prove the agreement by witnesses; it was questioned, whether a real servitude of this kind could be constituted by a verbal agreement, probable by witnesses. The Lords thought, that, even if such agreement were admitted, there is always a locus pænitentiæ till writ be adhibited; but that, in this case, if it should appear, that, in consequenee of such verbal agreement, the complainer had suffered the dyke to be built, he would now be barred, personali exceptione, from having it demolished; and, for that end, they allowed a proof of the agreement.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 161. Kilkerran.
*** This case is No 13. p. 8403. voce Locus PoenitentiÆ.