Subject_1 FIAR.
Simpson
v.
Wordie
1750 ,July 18 .
Case No.No. 10.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
By a postnuptial contract between Robert Robertson, younger, and Margaret Simpson, the father of the husband disponed some houses and other heritable subjects to the two spouses in conjunct fee and liferent, and to the children of the marriage in fee, which failing the husband's heirs and assignees; for the which causes the father disponed a tenement in the Canongate and a three 19 years tack of a shop, in the same terms to them two in conjunct fee and liferent, and to the children of the marriage in fee, which failing to the wife's heirs and assignees; and it appeared that the husband had besides got from the two fathers 4000 merks, which he is bound to employ for the children of the marriage, and the wife's father a bond from both the husband and wife for L.50 sterling, (I suppose the half of the computed value of the heritage) payable to another daughter of his, Beatrice, The husband broke, and a sale was pursued of his estate including what was conveyed by the wife's father;—and she prayed those subjects to be struck out of the sale because she was fiar. Sundry precedents were quoted on both sides, and the Lords found that the wife was fiar of the subjects conveyed by her father, and whereof the last termination after the children of the marriage was on her heirs and assignees, and ordered them to be struck out of the sale;—and it had some weight that there appeared to have been a tocher in money, though the several subjects were also disponed in contemplation, &c.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting