Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A Person being on the poor's roll found not liable in expense, although he appeared to have been litigious, and was admitted to have some subjects pertaining to him; in respect it was not thought consistent with the rules and constitution of the Court, that a person on the poor's roll should be decerned in expense.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 86. Kilkerran, (Poor.) No 2. p. 407.
*** A similar decision was pronounced 20th November 1772, Paton against Adamson, No 374. p. 7669, voce Jurisdiction.