Subject_1 MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.
Case of Ross-Shire
1745 ,Feb .6 .
Case No.No. 30.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr M'Kenzie of Seaforth having in terms of the act 1743 complained of Monro of Teananich and others, and served them with it upon our warrant, they notwithstanding thereof at Michaelmas last turned them out of the roll, upon which Monro, &c. complained. Upon answers we found the freeholders had no power to turn them out of the roll, and that therefore they were to be held as still on the roll, but prejudice of such judgment as shall be given in the other complaint against them, and found them liable in L.10 sterling of expenses and expense of decreet;—but we would give no judgment against Seaforth because of privilege, nor against Gorloch because his dwelling-house not designed in the execution,
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting