[1745] 1 Elchies 113
Subject_1 DAMAGE AND INTEREST.
Paterson
v.
Keith of Bruxie
1745 ,Feb. 28 .
Case No.No. 2.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In this case we allowed no consequential damages, and therefore none of the expenses of the pursuers process with the Baxters of Glasgow, to whom Paterson sold the wheat;
nor did we think that the rate at which the pursuer sold the wheat, or the damage he paid the Baxters, could be the rule. But we found (which will come to much the same) the pursuer entitled to the difference betwixt the price he was to have paid Bruxie, and the current price at Bo-ness, when Drummond's ship arrived.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting