Seduction. - Adultery. - Breach of promise of Marriage.
Stedman v. Stedman
1743.
June17. &
1744,
January20. Case No. No 8.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Stedman, a shopkeeper, having obtained a divorce against his wife for adultery, brought an action before the Court of Session against the adulterer for damages. Alleged, That the action was not competent, unless a criminal prosecution had been first brought before the Court of Justiciary. Answered, That where a man is hurt in his property, he may bring a civil action for the damages, without intenting a criminal prosecution for punishment of the offender, as for example, in the case of fire-raising. The Lords sustained the action as competent; found the defender liable in the expenses of the process of divorce, and of an appeal to the House of Lords, and of the present process; and appointed the pursuer to specify what damage he had sustained through the loss consequent to his business, and how he could liquidate the same.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 221. Kilkerran. C. Home.
*** This case is No 72. p. 7337, voce Jurisdiction.
