Subject_1 EXECUTOR.
Anderson
v.
Andersons
1743 ,Nov. 22 .
Case No.No. 12.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The question was, Whether a discharge by a son to his father, his heirs, executors, and successors, of certain intromissions with effects of the sons, and of his bairns part of gear, and of all he could claim of or from him and his foresaids by and through his decease, or for any other cause or occasion whatsoever, did exclude the son from succeeding in the dead's part? The Commissaries found that it did exclude him. But upon Arniston's report we found it did not, as we found in a like case 30th June 1741, Pringle against Pringle.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting