Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, collected by JAMES BURNETT, LORD MONBODDO.
Date: Town of Musselburgh
v.
Marquis of Tweed-Dale, &c
7 December 1743 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the case of Stuart of Urchilberg against Stuart, 20th November 1739, it was decided, or rather given up, that a charter from a subject, with a clause “cum molendinis et multuris” in the tenendas, together with a reddendo of a feu-duty “pro omni alio onere,” was a sufficient liberation from thirlage. In this case it seemed to be the opinion of the bench that a charter from a private person, or even from the church, (which was the case here,) with the above-mentioned clause in the tenendas, was a sufficient immunity from thirlage, without the reddendo, pro omni alio onere. If, notwithstanding of this liberation, the suckeners had continued to go to the mill and pay in-town multures, it was doubted how far this interpretation would obtain, and whether or not these words in the tenendas would not be accounted mere words of style.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting