Warning, in what Cases necessary. - How to be executed.
Earl of Darnlay v. Campbell
Date: 28 January 1742 Case No. No 81.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Where a tacksman of feu-duties had, after expiry of the tack, continued to possess by tacit relocation, it was found not necessary for the granter of the tack, intending to remove him, to use a formal warning, but that any intimation of the granter's will, to discontinue the tacit relocation, was sufficient.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 223. Kilkerran, (Removing.) No. 3. p. 481.
