Subject_1 POINDING.
Date: Alexander Le Grand
v.
William Chalmers
9 February 1742
Case No.No. 8.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Drummore had affirmed the Bailie of Leith's interlocutor, finding Mr Le Grand, Collector at Leith, liable in the creditor's debt, as having stopped his poinding, because the creditor intending to poind merchant goods on ship-board, applied to him Le Grand to allow him to enter them and receive the duty, which Mr Le Grand said he could not admit of by act of Parliament, but from the merchant, importer, or his factor or servant; and Drummore repelled the reasons of advocation, and remitted the cause;—but the Lords advocated and assoilzied.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting