Subject_1 JURISDICTION.
Master of the Mint
v.
F Stuart, &c.
1742 ,Feb. 26 .
Case No.No. 26.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords pretty unanimously found that we had no jurisdiction in this process against the Master of the Mint who had received sums from the Crown by way of imprest and to account; and that notwithstanding the former judgment in this very process against Lord Belhaven, and of the Ordinary's interlocutor not complained of in due time; and we thought that we could not be concluded by these regulations where we had no jurisdiction,—nobody opposing but Dun the Ordinary, But the President, Arniston, and I, were clear.—5th June Adhered, and refused a bill without answers.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting