Subject_1 Locus Pćnitentić.
Date: Seaton of Gardenrose
v.
Christie
3 June 1741
Case No.No. 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A transaction concerning sundry claims, on one of which adjudication had followed, not being reduced to writing, but one of the parties afterwards in a missve letter having mentioned the transaction and the transacted sum to be paid, viz. 5000 merks; the Lords found there was not locus pænitentiæ, unanimously, on a bill without answers.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting