[1741] 1 Elchies 308
Subject_1 OBLIGATION.
Irvine
v.
Earl of Aberdeen and Duff
1741 ,July 15 .
Case No.No. 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords would not affirm the two first points in Arniston's interlocutor finding that action did not lie on the unsigned agreement, nor secondly on the ratification; and they
seemed indeed all to differ from the Ordinary;—but they adhered to that part of it finding sufficient evidence that the defenders had performed, and found there was no necessity to determine the other points.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting