Subject_1 LOCUS PŒNITENTIĆ.
Seaton of Gardenrose
v.
Christie
1741 ,June 3 .
Case No.No. 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A verbal transaction of sundry claims, and some on which adjudication had followed, by which transaction 5000 mekes was to be paid for the claim, which transaction was never reduced to writing, but one of the parties afterwards wrote a letter mentioning the transaction and the sum to be paid, and promising security; the, Lords found there was no locus pœnitmti, and adhered unanimously to Arniston's interlocutor, and refused a bill without answers, whieh was pretty similar to the case 13th December 1710, Young against Nisbet, (Dict. No. 38. p. 8434.)
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting