[1739] 2 Elchies 98
Subject_1 BURGH ROYAL.
King's Advocate
v.
Smith of Annan
1739 .July .
Case No.No. 11.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
One's being the son of a burgess, having tenements in Burgh, enjoying the privileges as a burgess, and being chosen one of the Councillors of the Burgh, no sufficient evidence of his being a burgess, to increase the penalty of a clandestine marriage.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting