Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
M'Dowall
v.
M'Dowall
1739 ,Nov. 30 .
Case No.No. 19.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lord thought the not calling the summons within year and day was no objection to the interruption; but they found that the executing a blank summons was no interruption; and therefore adhered to the Ordinary's interlocutor, renit Drummore, and Arniston, who mentioned a decision Earl of Hume against Earl Marchmont,. but which kilkerran said was not at all on this point.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting