[1738] 1 Elchies 237
Subject_1 KIRK.
Town and Heritors of Selkirk
v.
The Duke of Roxburgh
1738 ,Feb. 9 .
Case No.No. 1b.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In respect there was no chancel or quire, the Lords found the Duke liable for the reparations only according to his valuation in the parish.—1st July 1736—9th February 1738 The Lords adhered.
This case concerning the reparation of the Kirk of Selkirk, was not advised till this day, (9th February 1738) when the Lords adhered to their interlocutor 1st July 1736, finding the Duke of Roxburgh though titular of the tithes liable only for his proportion according to his valuation, me quidem renit. for I thought there was sufficient evidence what were the terms or purport of the act of Council 1563, viz. that the Parson should repair the quire, or if there be no quire the third part of the Kirk. However it carried by a great majority.
*** The case under the Title Kirk Patrimony is not mentioned in the manuscript Notes.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting