[1737] 1 Elchies 432
Subject_1 SPUILZIE.
Campbell
v.
Campbell
1737 ,Nov .9 .
Case No.No. 1.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords adhered to the Ordinary's interlocutor finding that the pursuer had his oath in litem reserving modification; but some of the Lords doubted whether there should not be a proof of the quantities; at least if the defender should not be allowed a proof to be a meith for the Lords' modification. Wherefore we ordered the pursuer to give in a condescendence before deponing, reserving to the Lords to consider whether they would allow the defender such a proof or not. Sed vide Lord Colvil's Decisions 20th March 1573, fol. 4. b. fol 5. a, and fol 40. a and b, and fol. 46. a, and Feb. 1581, fol. 60. b; and Jan. 1581, fol. 76. b, and fol. 78. b, July 1583, fol. 98. b; Item fol. 28. b; Hadd 28th Jan. 1623.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting