[1737] 1 Elchies 356
Subject_1 PROCESS.
Hume
v.
Hume
1737 ,Nov .22 .
Case No.No. 9.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This being a transference in a contravention of lawburrows, in which an act had been pronounced but not extracted, the Lords found that the pursuer could not amend his libel, and remitted to the Ordinary to proceed accordingly, particularly upon the pursuer's title. This arose from a difficulty that occurred to the Bench, Whether such a contravention descends to executors or to the pursuer the heir?
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting