Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Sir James Dalrymple
v.
Duncan
1737 ,July 14 ,Dec. 6 .
Case No.No. 14.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords adhered to their interlocutor in so far as it found Mr Edmonston's minority ought to be deducted. But found no occasion to determine the other as to Carnwath, and the reason of adding this, was a doubt Arniston had as to Carnwath's, who was not within year and day of the other adjudgers; though if that question had been put, the majority seemed of opinion of the interlocutor.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting