Subject_1 BILL OF EXCHANGE.
Ker
v.
Chalmers
1737 ,Feb. 22 .
Case No.No. 14.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
I keep these papers, not because of any difficulty in point of law, but because of a loose erroneous expression of Lord Stair. But notwithstanding thereof the Lords unanimously adhered to my interlocutor, finding the last bill being first protested preferable to the, other bill though prior in date.
(See Stair, B. 1. T. 11. §7.)
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting