Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Mary Seaton
v.
Forbes, &c
1736 ,Feb. 11 .
Case No.No. 9.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords thought the action not prescribed, since the deed remained so long latent, nor did they think the disposition prescribed, because of the reserved liferent, and therefore the prescription could not run. But remitted to the Ordinary to hear further upon the time of delivery and filling up the trustee's name.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting