Subject_1 PONDING.
Mowbray
v.
Drummond
1736 ,Feb. 19 .
Case No.No. 5.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords adhered to the former interlocutor finding the poinding oppressive, but by the President's casting vote it carried, no spuilzie. For the spuilzie were Royston, Kilkerran, Murkle, et ego. Against it were Newhall, Minto, Haining, Monzie, and President.—31st January 1736.
The Lords adhered to the former interlocutor of the 31st ult. finding it no spuilzie, though many of the Lords thought it should not be a precedent.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting