[1736] 1 Elchies 45
Subject_1 BANKRUPT.
Young
v.
Smith
1736 ,July 9 .
Case No.No. 7.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The question was argued, whether a reduction on the act 1696 be competent for repeating the part of the price paid to the creditors; but upon a division 15th June, the Lords adhered. For the interlocutor, were Royston, Newhall, Justice-Clerk, Monzie, Easdale, Murkle, Leven. Against it were Haining, Drummore, Strichen, Tinwald, Coupar.—9th July The Lords adhered.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting