[1735] 1 Elchies 502
Subject_1 WADSET.
Cochran of Hill
v.
Cochran
1735 ,Dec. 2 .
Case No.No. 2.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords allowed a proof before answer of working coal and limestone cum onere maximarum expensarum. The President was of a different opinion, because the sale being for an adequate price he thought this reversion expired without declarator; and I should have been of the same opinion, but as that point was settled by the Ordinary's interlocutor, and we could not now review or alter it, I thought it could not alter the point of law supposing it to be a wadset, and so the proof was granted.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting