Subject_1 FIAR.
Children of Frogg
v.
Granger
1735 ,Nov. 25 .
Case No.No. 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords after many times considering this altered the interlocutor, and found Robert Frogg had the fee and not a naked liferent, Royston renitente. What determined Newhall was only the former decisions, but I was determined only by a clause that I thought supposed fee and property might descend to some of the substitutes to whom only a liferent was expressly given, which showed the disponers voluntas. The President and Drummore insisted that it was impossible a fee could be in pendenti,but most of us thought that did not apply to the case.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting