Writs defective in Solemnities, Whether capable of Support, so as to furnish Action?
Chatto v. Davidson
1730.
February. Case No. No. 317.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A bill of exchange null as bearing annual-rent and penalty, was found not homologated even by a posterior payment of part of the principal sum; for if it was not good as a bill, it could be considered as nothing but a note neither holograph nor having witnesses, which in our law cannot so much as furnish an action. See Appendix.
Fol Dic. v. 2. p. 554.
*** The direct contrary was found February 1733, Brown against Irvine of Wiseby. See Appendix.
