Competion Charles Row with the other Creditors of Rusco
1727.
June. Case No. No 43.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
It was objected against an inhibition, that there was nothing in the letters prohibiting the lieges to lend their money to the person inhibited, and to take bond or security therefor; that upon that account the inhibition could not strike against posterior bonds, though by these the heritage might be evicted. The Lords sustained the inhibition good against these bonds, in so far as they might affect the heritage, in respect of the general clause “inhibiting and discharging the lieges, under whatsomever colour or pretext to buy, block, or receive any other manner of way, from the debtor, any of his lands, heritage, &c. in defraud foresaid.” See Appendix.
