William Bowles, Solicitor in Exchequer, v. Sir John Johnston of Caskieben
Date: 22 February 1715 Case No. No 28.
A cautioner having paid the debt; in a competition betwixt him and the donatar of the principal debtor's bastardy, the penalty of the bond was restricted to the sum really paid out by the cautioner to the creditor.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir John Johnston being cautioner to the town of Aberdeen for one Douglas, baxter there; and having a bond of relief in the ordinary terms; upon Douglas's death William Bowles obtained a gift of bastardy; and Sir John insisted for payment against the donatar, libelling upon his bond, of relief, and also for another sum of L. 55 Scots, due to him by the bastard. In this process Sir John acknowledged, Upon oath, payment of L. 36 Scots; and at the advising his oath, gave in a bill for expenses, which was refused, and so the decreet went out, as to the bond of relief, in the terms of the libel, decerning the donatar either to free, relieve, &c. or make payment of the said sums, &c. after the form and tenor of the said bond of relief in all points. In a suspension of this decreet, the point in question being, “Whether the penalty of the first bond by Douglas to the Town of Aberdeen, is due to the cautioner?” the donatar contended, it was not,
Because, 1mo, The charger having insisted upon the alternative of payment, to which no penalty is taxed in the great decernitor, could not therefore now charge upon the first member of the alternatives, to relieve him of the bond and penalty therein contained: 2do, That there was no penalty adjected to the bond of relief, but only in that granted to the town of Aberdeen; to which, although Sir John obtained assignation upon payment, yet the town did not exact the full penalty: 3tio, That the donatar is in the case of an executor, who must have a decreet for his warrant, and therefore liable in no penalty nor expenses: 4to, No penalty or expenses here, because of the pluris petitio, Sir John having received L. 36 as said is.
Answered for the charger, That here there was only a penalty craved, and the Lords do often refuse expenses where persons have been litigious, and yet sustain the penalties in bonds for reimbursing the damages the creditors may sustain on account of the expenses debursed; and the decreet, though it assoilzies from the L. 36, yet decerns for the rest of the libel; now the penalty was expressly libelled on: 2do, That though there be no penalty in the bond of relief, yet it obliges Douglas to relieve Sir John of the penalty contained in the first bond, or pay it to him; and therefore he having failed in the first, it was just to decern him in the second: 3tio, Though the donatar must have a decreet, yet that can never excuse his extraordinary litigiousness: 4to, That there was no pluris petitio; for, at commencement of Sir John's process, the full L. 55 was due; but it having depended long, Sir John in the interim recovered L. 36 by a furthcoming, and fairly in his oath acknowledged and allowed the same.
The Lords restricted the penalty of the bond granted to the treasurer of Aberdeen; wherein the charger was bound with Douglas the bastard, to the sums paid by the charger to the creditor.
Act. Graham.Alt. Horn.Clerk, Justice.
Bruce, No 85. p. 102.
