Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL. Subject_2 I sat in the Outer-House this week.
Catharine Craig, Wife of Alexander Short, v. Sir Andrew Birny, Lord Saline
Date: 24 January 1710
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There being several transactions betwixt Alexander Short, merchant in Stirling, and Sir Andrew Birny of Saline, in 1679; the said Sir Andrew, for certain reasons, by a bond of annuity, settles upon the said Sir Alexander an annuity of £20 Scots, monthly, which extends to £20 sterling per annum, bearing that it shall not be assignable; but, not being paid for several years, he assigns it to Catharine Craig, his wife, who pursues my Lord Saline for payment of the bygone arrears of that annuity.
He first alleged that she had no right, being declared not assignable. Answered,—He being a simple man unfit for business, this was inserted to exclude gratuitous assignees, but could not hinder his wife to take a right to it ad susti' Tienda onera matrimonii; the very end for which the bond was granted.
The Lords sustained the assignation.
2do, He alleged it was discharged and renounced by the said Alexander, under his hand, for sundry onerous causes. Mrs Short, in answer, repeated a reduction of this discharge, as impetrated per vim et metum, having put him in the tolbooth on the pretence of threatening to shoot him; and, to rescue himself from prison, he had granted him that discharge; whereas all the Doctors make the metus carceris a sufficient ground of reponing against any deed so extorted; and, for proving it, adduced an obligement by Alexander to reenter in prison if ever he shall contravene, with a great many supersederes under my Lord Saline's hand, where the keepers and turnkeys in the tolbooth are witnesses.
The Lords, on this probation, found the discharge was granted metti carceris, and reduced it; and gave decreet for £3150 Scots, due for the bygones of the aliment.
Upon which my Lord, being apprehended, was incarcerated in the tolbooth of Edinburgh; and, after many communings and endeavours, at last he insisted in a suspension and reduction of that decreet, and repeated his reasons, 1mo, That the decreet was surreptitiously extracted in the end of a Session, on a bill given in, not so much as marked by the clerks, nor signed by any advocate, but by herself, and proceeded upon a supposition, taken for granted, that the discharge was extorted metu carceris, and yet not a syllable of it proven; and the very decreet itself wants these words,—that they found it proven,—but allenarly bears, The Lords find the allegeance of its being signed in prison relevant, and therefore decern; so the decreet is evidently null, as without all manner of probation quoad that point: And Providence has overruled the clerks to minute it so, to leave room for oppressed innocence not to be overthrown, and concluded in a decreet in foro.
Answered for Mrs Short,—That she oppones her decreet, wherein all now obtruded is either proponed and repelled, or competent and omitted; which are the two great bulwarks and security of the lieges for sopiting pleas, and preventing their eternity. And if this decreet be not able to abide the test, they know no sentence can be firm. Though the clerks had by mistake omitted these words, that the Lords found it proven, as well as relevant, yet it is plain, by the whole context, that it was actually and fully proven; and a petition given in by my Lord Saline, alleging, as he does now, that the metus carceris was not proven, yet was refused.
Replied for my Lord Saline,—That the imprisonment (esto it were proven that he was in these circumstances, as truly he was not,) is not relevant to annul a deed; for the most part of transactions are entered into when debtors are under diligence for performing their just obligations. Now, if I have him under caption, and to prevent future imprisonment he give me a further security, this is justus metus et legalis, and can have no influence to invalidate the deed, else most of our agreements might be quarrelled; and nothing repones him but when it is taken from one actually in prison, and to be detained there if he did not condescend to what is demanded of him.
The Lords, from a principle of compassion as well as justice, to mitigate this woman's rigorous execution, took hold of the defect of the decreet, which did not bear it was proven, and therefore sustained the nullity; but the form did not allow him to come forth till it was read in the minute-book, and a charge to set at liberty: but allowed her yet to prove Alexander Short her husband granted that discharge, to redeem himself out of prison. Saline did likewise instruct, that Alexander Short was debtor to him, by intromission with some moveables, and intrusion into a house of his in Stirling; which circumstances likewise moved the Lords to the foresaid decision.
