[1709] Mor 4240
Subject_1 FIAR.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. In questions betwixt Husband and wife, who understood Fiar.
Subject_3 SECT. III. Where the Wife's Heirs last in the Institution.
Date: William Fead Drover
v.
George Maxwell of Dalswinton and Others
4 February 1709
Case No.No 32.
A person in his daughter's contract of marriage having assigned to her and her husband, and their heirs of the marriage, whom failing, the wife's heirs and assignees, all goods and gear belonging to the cedent at the time of his decease, the wife was found to be far.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In William Fead's contract of marriage with Helen Watson, daughter to John Watson in Dalswinton, John Watson obliged himself to pay to William Fead, his heirs, executors, or assignees, 900 merks of tocher betwixt and a certain term; and further constituted the said future spouses and the heirs of the marriage, which failing, the said Helen, her heirs, or assignees, his assignees to all goods and gear belonging to him the time of his decease. After the death of John and Helen Watsons, William Fead raised a process against John's relict, Dalswinton, and others his debtors, libelling and concluding exhibition, delivery and payment of all John Watson's debts and effects in their hands.
Alleged for the defenders; The husband could claim no more than the liferent, the wife being fiar, in so far as the last termination is in favours of her heirs or assignees, and the subject came by her.
Answered for the pursuer; According to the opinions of my Lord Stair, Instit. Lib. 3. tit. 5. Heirs, p. 481. and Dirleton, Doubts, p. 68. and 69. and 184, where there are diverse degrees of substitution of heirs of diverse persons, and a wife and her heirs in the last place, the person whose heirs are provided for in the first place, is understood to fiar, and those in secundis tabulis, in a remote degree, to be only heirs of provision failing the former.
The Lords found the wife to be fiar; not because the substitution did terminate upon her heirs, but because it was in favours of her heirs and assignees, and none but who is fiar can assign.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting