[1708] 4 Brn 718
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Subject_2 I sat in the Outer-House this week.
Date: John Gordon of Rosecarrel
v.
M'Lellan
13 November 1708 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Commissary of Kirkcudbright decerns John Gordon of Rosecarrel to stand at the market-cross with a paper on his breast, bearing it was for defaming and slandering of Helen Maxwell, spouse to Charles M'Lellan of Colline, as guilty of adultery: and also, to stand bareheaded at the church door, and acknowledge, that he had fasely lied on her, and then to pay 500 merks to Samuel Cairnmont, his procurator-fiscal, as a pecuniary mulct for his defamation, and repairing her honour.
Of this sentence he craves a suspension, on this reason,—That all proven against him was, that he had come to the minister and some of the elders, and told he had heard a fama clamosa in the country, of her being guilty, and asked them what they knew about it: the occasion whereof was neither an affected curiosity nor a malicious design to reproach her; but having got a citation in August last, when the clerks to the circuit courts were taking up dittays for the Porteous-roll, to compear and depone what delinquents or criminals he knew in his bounds; having oft heard a flagrant report and suspicion of her being an adulteress, he, for clearing his own conscience, ad exonerandam animam, went to the minister and kirk-session to be informed if there were any grounds for that report, before he should give his oath; which was no more than the duty of every good man: and yet this is aggravated by the commissary as a crime, and the foresaid unjust sentence pronounced thereon. And that the
rumour was not wholly groundless, appears from thir circumstances:—that Coline, the husband, deserted her company for some time on this same report; and that she is presently before the Presbytery, where things very indecent are already sworn against her. The Lords remembered that Veritas convitti non excusat a convitto where it is done animo injuriandi: But this proceeded neither from petulancy or malice, but only to inform himself when, necessitate juris, he was called to depone what crimes he knew in his parish: and so the Lords thought the commissary had committed gross iniquity; and therefore passed the suspension, and reserved, to the conclusion and discussing of the cause, what such particularity deserved.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting