[1707] Mor 11349
Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Presumed Alteration and Revocation.
Date: Livingston
v.
Menzies and Livingston
31 December 1707
Case No.No 15.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Tearing away the sidescription from the joining of the first and second sheets of a tailzie, was not found to annul the tailzie, although the obligation to resign, the procuratory of resignation, and lands, were contained in the first sheet; because sidescribing is not an indispensable solemnity in private voluntary rights, as it is in decrees, inhibitions, and other diligences; and further, the maker of the tailzie considered it as valid, notwithstanding the sidescription was torn off, by some days thereafter signing a revocation thereof, except as to a particular effect, for which he declared it was to subsist.
*** This case is No 69. p. 3261. voce Deathbed.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting