[1704] Mor 2123
Subject_1 CAUTIONER.
Subject_2 SECT. VII. Relief of Cautioners.
Date: Drummond
v.
Lord Justice-Clerk
9 February 1704
Case No.No 56.
An arrestment, upon a bond of relief, was held to be good in competition with another arrestment, the cautioner having paid before forth-coming.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the competition betwixt Adam Drummond of Megginch and Prestonhall, Lord Justice-Clerk, both creditors to Sir Thomas Stewart of Balcasky, and arresters in Blairhall's hands, Megginch craved preference as the first arrester, being prior tempore he was potior jure. Answered for the Justice-Clerk, Though your arrestment be prior, yet being upon a bond of relief, that can never be a sufficient legal ground of arrestment, obligements ad factum præstandum neither being liquid nor commensurate to the debt; whereas he had arrested on a clear
liquid bond. Replied, His arrestment was not only raised on a registrate bond of relief, but likewise on an action intented on that bond, and before the competition in the forthcoming, his bond of relief was both liquidate and purified; for he had made payment, and taken assignation to the debt; and cautioners would be in a very bad condition if they might not affect their debtor's means by arrestment on their obligements of relief; and it is now triti juris that adjudications may proceed for relief even before distress, as was sustained to the Duchess of Lauderdale against the Earl, (See Husband and Wife.), and the Justice-Clerk's arrestment can never compete with him, not only because of its posteriority, but that it is not laid on upon a registrate bond, which is a decreet, and has paratam executionem, but on a bond unregistrate, which is no better than a libel or a dependence: And it cannot be denied but an arrestment on a bond of relief would put the debtor in mala fide to pay, and make him liable in the breach of arrestment, though he could not be decerned to make forthcoming till first the subject were liquidate by a distress or payment; but here Megginch had paid the debt, and was made assignee thereto. Duplied, A forthcoming is an executive process, wherein nothing can be of new constituted, that was not in being at the laying on of the arrestment; so that if the ground of the arrestment was not then pure and liquidate, no decreet of forthcoming can follow thereon; but the creditor in the relief, after he has paid the debt, must lay on a new arrestment, upon that clear and simple ground of debt, and then a valid action of forthcoming will properly follow. ——The Lordsthought an illiquid fact was not a ground whereupon an arrestment could be used, but if it were made liquid before the forthcoming, the arrestment stood good; and therefore Megginch having paid and acquired in the debt (for which he had the bond of relief) before the competition in the furthcoming, that liquidation was retrotracted to validate his arrestment, as much as if the debt had been liquid at the time he laid on his arrestment; but allowed my Lord Justice-Clerk to be heard on this point, whether his arrestment intervening before Megginch's liquidation, that was a medium impedimentum to hinder its drawing back, so as to give the Justice-Clerk's arrestment the preference.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting