Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Where an inhibition of teind was only, in general, against all and sundry, but neither executed personally, nor at any man's dwelling-house, the Lords refused to sustain the same to interrupt bona fide possession, in consequence of a right to the teinds in question, obtained a non domino, or to make the party a mala fide possessor; though it may be sufficient to interrupt tacit relocation.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 429. Fountainhall.
*** This case is No. 19. p. 10630. voce Possessory Judgment.
