[1693] Mor 12548
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. Public Instrument, how far Probative.
Subject_3 SECT. V. Extract.
Date: Wallace
v.
Earl of Dundonald
21 February 1693
Case No.No 433.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Wallace of Neilstownside against the Earl of Dundonald, and the Tenants of Glen.—The Lords having read the act of Parliament in 1617, they found an extract, out of the Register of Reversions, is declared to make as much faith, (except in the case of improbation and falsehood,) as out of the Register
of Sasines; though the parties get back their principal evidents again: And, therefore, they not only found this extract a sufficient title ad inchoandam litem as of before, but also decerned in the poinding of the ground. But if Dundonald raise an improbation, he will force them either to produce the principal bond, (which is the warrant of the sasine,) or else obtain certification against it.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting