[1692] Mor 12192
Subject_1 PROCESS.
Subject_2 SECT. XVIII. Decress in Absence.
Date: Philp of Almerycloss
v.
Ogilvy of Innerquharity
29 December 1692
Case No.No 339.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords were divided on this question, if it was to be reputed a decreet in foro where a pary appeared, and produced an interest, as a ground of competition on the subject in controversy, but afterwards was absent, and proponed nothing upon his inserest; so that compearing in this manner, and finding his
right posterior, he might withdraw, and then vex men with new processes; but the plurality found it a decreet in foro. Yet it could not be accounted a decreet in foro contradictorio, no defence being proponed, as the act of regulation 1672 requires.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting