Process against Sub-Tacksmen and Intromitters, with Subjects hypothecated. - What if caution or payment has been offered by the Intromitters, or if sufficiency has been left to answer the rent.
Lamington v. James Oswald
Date: 28 July 1688 Case No. No 31.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Found, that the receiver of thirty-eight bolls of corn, of a crop nineteen years before, from a tenant, was liable to the master jure hypothecæ, for the rent of that former year, if not exceeding the value of the bolls received, unless it were made appear, that corns and goods were then left upon the ground sufficient to satisfy that year's rent. But there was some speciality in the case, and other reasons concurred.
