Reduction upon the Act 1621, whether competent at the instance of Creditors having done Diligence, against one another.
Young v. Charles Murray
1688.
November. Case No. No 153.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A debtor's disposition to a creditor, who had charged him after he had been charged by another, being quarrelled as a gratification, it was answered, That the disposition being granted in obedience to a charge, it cannot be reputed a voluntary gratification.
Replied: That such a disposition cannot prejudge the more timely diligence of a creditor who was not in mora: Which reply the Lords found relevant.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 79. Harcarse, (Alienation.) No 157. p. 35.
