Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date:22 February 1688 John Callander
v.
Rae and Andrew Forrester
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
John Callander, smith, having obtained a decreet against Rae, a barber, and Andrew Forrester, bower, for £1400, as the expenses of the process carried on by the King's Tradesmen against the Town of Edinburgh, for declaring them free of cess and other burdens, as mentioned 20th March 1684, they being bound conjunctly and severally with the rest for reimbursing him:—it was suspended, 1mo, Because, by a posterior agreement, they stood only bound pro rata. 2do, He had lost his expenses by his prevarication in disclaiming the pursuit before the Town Council of Edinburgh; et mandatarius excedens fines mandati perdit actionem contrariam pro impensis; and much more if he betray his trust.
The Lords, before answer, ordained the suspenders to depone, whether they knew of the alleged disclamation when they subscribed the last stated account, bearing the obligation on the back thereof, for payment of the total sums therein mentioned; or what time they came to understand the foresaid disclamation: and ordained them to produce the said disclamation. Likeas, they ordained the charger to depone what expenses he truly depursed before the said disclamation, as also what he truly expended after it, upon account of the pursuit; for the Lords resolved to give him no expenses since his disclamation, but only those before.
The Deacon having reclaimed against this, and the Lords having considered his bill with the answers, on the 28th February, they stopped their foresaid interlocutor, and refused to take the oaths of Rae and Forrester, the suspenders, anent their knowledge of the said declamation; which they found has been understood by them in the process before the Commissaries: (the mistake of
this was, that one procurator proponed promiscuously a defence for all the defenders, though all of them did not know of the disclamation, but only some:) and therefore the Lords ordained John Callander to depone upon the verity of the haill articles of his account; reserving to themselves to modify the charges expended by him, as they see cause, because he carried on several other causes of his own under the pretence of this.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting