Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ROGER HOG OF HARCARSE.
Crichy Gray
v.
Pollock Maxwell
1687 .July .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the foresaid cause betwixt Gray of Crichie and Pollock Maxwell, No. 924, [Pollock Maxwell, &c. against Gray of Crichie, February 1687,] a new execution being produced, with a full designation of Hugh Wallace, and the same being also quarrelled as null, for that it was not stamped;—it was alleged for the pursuer, That stamping is in desuetude; but, if that be found necessary, the messenger will yet stamp it, the first execution being truly stamped. The Lords allowed the execution to be stamped, the messenger deponing that the first execution was stamped.
In this cause the Lords found, That actions to the behoof of the king's donatars ought to be inrolled conform to the Act of Parliament. The like was found in Brodie of Lethem's cause.
Page 261, No. 927.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting