[1686] Mor 12482
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION II. Single Witness, in what cases sustained.
Subject_3 SECT. III. Administrator's Oath, if relevant against his Constituent?
Major Buntein and Drummelzier
v.
Murray of Stenhope
1686 .January .
Case No.No 334.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A gift of marriage for the behoof of the vassal himself being decerned to be communicated to the sub-vassal, upon his paying a proportion of the composition, and the expenses laid out in procuring the same; the Lords found the composition and expenses relevant to be proved by the pursuer's oath, without necessity of any other instruction.
*** This case is No 16. p. 7763, voce Jus Superveniens.
*** See the like, March 1684, Bruce against Fraser, No 82. p. 9226, voce Mutual Contract.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting