[1686] 3 Brn 591
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date:23 March 1686 Thomas Aikman
v.
Mary Littlejohn
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Lord Carse reported the case of Mr Thomas Aikman against Mary Littlejohn: Mr Thomas pursues on a comprising for maills and duties. Alleged,
—They have the benefit of a possessory judgment by virtue of an infeftment on a comprising; and so it must stand good till it be reduced. Answered,—There was an old Act betwixt them in 1667, ordaining Littlejohn to count and reckon; which interrupted the bona fides.
Replied,—1mo, That count and reckoning was now sleeping these many years, and behoved to be wakened. 2do, They had attained the benefit of a new possessory judgment since that.
The Lords found no possessory judgment in this case, and sustained process. The words are:—Find no need of wakening or transferring the same, and therefore, conform to Lord Carse's decerniture, ordain the Act of count and reckoning to be extracted, and a diet to be appointed for that effect before the auditor in the said count and reckoning.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting