Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date:20 February 1685 Sir Patrick Hume
v.
Robert Colt
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The case between Sir Patrick Hume and Mr Robert Colt, advocates, about the means of one William Hepburn, sutor in the Canongate, was heard. Hepburn having been examined on deathbed, on a petition given in by Sir Patrick Hume to the bailies of Edinburgh, if the money he had lent to the incorporation of the Cordiners there, was the money of Captain Stewart, to whom Sir Patrick was confirmed executor; he confessed, the Captain, a little before his death, had laid £100 sterling in beside him, but that he afterwards called for it, and divided it amongst his soldiers. As also the deacons and masters of the said trade, being examined, (which the Lords found irregular, to examine a man's debtors, to whom the money belonged;) some of them declared, he called it Captain Stewart's money: which he might do, under this pretext, to seek better caution for it.
This cause being advocated, and the oath of Hepburn alleged to contain an extrinsic quality, and that he ought to prove his restoring the money to Captain Stewart; the Lords, on Castlehill's report, found the quality intrinsic, and therefore assoilyied. See Dury, 1st July 1624, Kinloch.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting