Subject_1 EXHIBITION AD DELIBERANDUM. Subject_2 SECT. I.
Competent to all sorts of heirs.
Lady Yester v. Dutchess of Lauderdale
1684.
March. Case No. No 6.
A party held a general disposition, alleging it conveyed only nomina debitorum, and therefore exhibition ad deliberandum was not competent. Found obliged to exhibit before answer as to import of the deed.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an exhibition ad deliberandum, at the instance of the Lady Yester, against the Dutchess of Lauderdale, of bonds granted to the Duke, and in the defender’s custody;
Alleged for the defender, That she had a disposition and assignation to all sums of money belonging to the Duke, and consequently nomina debitorum.
Answered, By sums of money nothing can be understood but sums lying by the defunct in specie.
The Lords, before answer to the import of the clause, ordained the defender to exhibit ad deliberandum.
March 1685.—The Lady Yester having insisted in the exhibition, it was alleged for the defender, That the pursuer having granted a bond to found a real diligence against her father's estate, and being charged thereon, and renouncing, she ought not to have inspection; for this is not like the renunciation of an apparent heir charged by a creditor.
Answered, That an apparent heir renouncing to one, may either renounce to another, or enter heir in obedience to the charge, and so may deliberate about entering, and ought to have inspection. Again, apparent heirs granting of bonds to adjudge their predecessor's estate upon, infers no passive, unless they come to possess, or intromit by virtue of the right, as is clear from the act of sederunt.
The Lords found the defender ought to make a term in the exhibition.
