Virtual Interdiction. - Solemnities in publication. - Effect after publication. - Effect as to moveables or personal execution.
Gordon of Park v. Arthur Forbes
Date: 2 December 1681 Case No. No 14.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The execution of an interdiction found null, because it bore not “after three oyesses,” but only 'after proclamation and public reading of the letters;' but this was stopped.
Harcarse, (Interdiction.) No 643. p. 177.*** Fountainhall reports this case.
Dec. 1.—An interdiction was found null, because its execution did not bear three oyesses to have been given.