Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
John Inglis, Advocate, v. William Chieslt, Christian Tarbet, and William Allan
Date: 19 November 1681
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the action John Inglis, advocate, against Mr William Chiesly and Christian Tarbet, and William Allan, servitor to Mr Walter Pringle, advocate; Mr William having deponed on the terms of the depositation of the new bond, the Lords ordained him to be reexamined* if he had any warrant or order from James Tarbet elder to give up the old bond to Sir John Chiesly the debtor, and to take a new one; or to cancel the two daughters' assignations; seeing his son's bringing the bond when his father was in agone mortis, was no presumption of any warrant he had from his father to that effect; which might have been presumed if his father had been in liege poustie.
